OpenCode 사용해 보기지금 써보기

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B0/10034/10084/10062/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
262K
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.05/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
63K
169K
Completed sessions
557,124
4,680,897
Token share
0.16%
0.31%
Tokens
2.4T+100%
4.5T+17%
SEP 21NOV 15
SEP 21NOV 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.