Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.6

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10067/10080/10033/10092/100
Kimi K2.650/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark79/10041/10062/10050/10027/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$2.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.13/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
6.5M
35K
Completed sessions
188,176,010
127,144
Token share
55.4%
0%
Tokens
807T+1,028%
40B-90%
SEP 21NOV 15
SEP 21NOV 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.6%637K user-weeks
49.1%1.5K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.