Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Ember
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Muse EmberMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 68/100 | 25/100 | 71/100 | 80/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Muse Ember | 100/100 | 0/100 | 71/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
258K
41K
Completed sessions
2,480,811
554,695
Token share
0.14%
0.15%
Tokens
2.1T+100%
2.2T+100%
SEP 21NOV 15
SEP 21NOV 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.1%7.7K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMuse Ember vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Ember·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Ember vs Jamba MiniMuse Ember·Jamba Mini